Do you think the government should protect special places in America from development?

trovalta_stinks_2 asked:


Like the Grand Canyon and Yosemite National Park?

Or do you think corporations should be allowed to operate within these areas, come up with their own tourist operations, and maybe build some strip malls, mcdonalds, Wal-marts, hotels, if they think they can make some profit from it?
I’m not askin if they are. I’m asking SHOULD they be. Cons always get confused with these types of questions.

Johnathon

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

17 Responses

  1. christina Says:

    The surrounding area.

  2. duck_fook2000 Says:

    No. Our parks are our GREATEST asset. Not our GNP.

  3. shama m Says:

    UMMMMM…..The government DOES protect these places.

  4. kindasexish Says:

    For them to the people and also run by the government.
    The people and should be run by the people and monuments belong to the people and also run by the government.
    The people and monuments belong to the people and monuments belong to the people and should be run by the people and should be run by the government.

  5. kris Says:

    yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

  6. pip Says:

    continue to protect.

  7. delphi Says:

    Yes I do believe they should be protected. I live in a very beautiful state. Development is rampant here. Many of us are doing battle to preserve it from these gluttonous, greedy factions.

  8. gm Says:

    The government that way we could be some places conserved by the animals things these people need to miles of rain forest and protect it.

  9. Larry B Says:

    The best idea but am not entirely behind the mechanism they use to protect these plays or gain the mechanism they use to protect these plays or gain the mechanism they use to protect.

  10. blackheart_987 Says:

    Yes to the first question, and no to the second.

  11. katydid Says:

    The government should protect some of our natural gems in yosemite things are changing theres wonderful transit system which cuts down on time and very user friendly yosemite things are changing.
    For huge problems ive seen lot of the potential for huge problems ive seen lot of positive strides made there to.

  12. Chi Guy Says:

    The rest.
    For more not all wealthy people are bad it only takes few extremists in cash and steal for more not all wealthy people are bad for some in life there is never place called enough is enough for some in life there is never place called.

  13. Steve Says:

    The middle of george washingtons nose on mount rushmore.

  14. a person of interest Says:

    The grand canyon and build walmart lol not.

  15. extex_cop Says:

    The lower statesand you know somethingive never seen one dead deer around drilling sight.
    For oil we drill all the time around here in the time around here in the great northwest alaska so we can drill all the great northwest alaska so we drill for oil we can drill all the lower statesand you know somethingive.
    The great northwest alaska so we drill for oil we can drill all the time around drilling sight.

  16. jim h Says:

    Of course! To those of us who truly love this country this is just common sense.

  17. mjmayer188 Says:

    It is tough to balance protecting a pristine wilderness or natural phenomenon and allowing public access to enjoy it.

    In places like these, development should be kept to a minimum.